![]() In the case of XDCAM, AME is more than three times slower.Ĭlick here to download a 2-page PDF with more detailed test results. (Duration is expressed as Hours:Minutes:Seconds.)Īs you can see in the chart, the speed improvements in the 2015 version are slight and, in the case of 2-pass compression, the new version is slower than the older version.Īt no time does the latest version of AME exceed the speed of the latest version of Apple Compressor. What I did, to compare results, was total the amount of time it took to compress all four files, using both 1-pass (fastest) and 2-pass (theoretically the highest quality) compression. (Click the image to download a 2-page PDF providing more detailed test results.) All source media and resulting compressed files were stored locally. No other changes were made to the compression setting for this test. To allow me to compare results between software, I changed the default bit rate from 16 mbps to 10 mbps, which matched the default bit rate for Apple Compressor. These are the same test files I used in all previous compression speed tests, so you can compare results between tests.ĭuring compression all files were scaled to 1280 x 720, using the YouTube 720 preset shipped with Adobe Media Encoder.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |